Labels

SUPPORT JULIAN ASSANGE

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

US Missile Defense Allows Covert Nuclear Strike Against Russia - General Staff

LIVE
    Nuclear mushroom

    US Missile Defense Allows Covert Nuclear Strike Against Russia - General Staff

    © Photo: pixabay
    MILITARY & INTELLIGENCE
    Get short URL
    4
    1001126

    US missile defense creates an opportunity for a covert nuclear missile strike against Russia, first deputy chief of the General Staff's Main Operational Department, Lt. Gen. Viktor Poznikhir said on Wednesday.

    "The presence of US missile defense bases in Europe, missile defense vessels in seas and oceans close to Russia creates a powerful covert strike component for conducting a sudden nuclear missile strike against the Russian Federation," he said.
    The results of computer simulation confirm that the US missile defense is directed against Russia and China, Poznikhir said.
    "Russian representatives have often appealed to the US side, drawing their attention to the danger the global missile defense system poses to the strategic balance of forces in the world. But facts are ignored. The US claims its missile defense system is not directed against Russia and China. But… the results of computer simulation testify to the contrary," he said.
    DETAILS TO FOLLOW

    Manlio Dinucci -- The Chains of “anchorage” to the U.S.A.

    «THE ART OF WAR» 

    The Chains of “anchorage” to the U.S.A.

    What a blessing it is to have an ally like Italy! This darling State that will not raise questions, pays its Nato contribution without raising an eyebrow and which will not hesitate to provide logistical aid, when invited to do so. It does not really matter that Italy is in the same boat as the rest of us: clueless as to the White House’s prevailing policy and thus the ultimate goal to which all its efforts will be directed. War continues to be waged, with men falling like flies. So yes, Italy’s loyalty cannot be questioned but what end does it really serve?
     | ROME (ITALY)  
    JPEG - 33.9 kb
    In the newspapers and on the TV news, there is barely any coverage on the meeting between Trump and Gentiloni. Yet this was an event that was anything but formal. For Gentiloni, the challenge was to dispel the doubts on the attitude of his government to the new US President. Such doubts were the legacy of the Renzi government (in which Gentiloni was the Minister of Foreign Affairs). For the Renzi government had not sought to disguise that it was supporting Obama and Clinton against Trump in the [US] presidential elections.
    Gentiloni had done a fantastic job, confirming the “historic anchorage” of Italy to the United States, “the cornerstone of our foreign policy”, regardless of who is in office at the White House. President Trump gives credit to Italy, recalling that “more than 30,000 American soldiers and their families are based across your country” and that after the United States, Italy “is the second largest contributor of troops in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan”.
    The Italian contribution is actually far greater than what Trump acknowledges. This is evidenced by the increasing number of arms sent from U.S.A/Nato bases in Italy, to the Middle East, officially for the war against terrorism.
    Such consignments can be traced if you follow the journey of specific ships: for example, the cargo vessel Excellent (flying the Maltese flag, but manned by an Italian crew), hired from the Ministry of Defense, left on 19 April from Piombino having uploaded an enormous quantity of armoured “Lynx” and weapons. It then made a stopover two days later at Augusta. This is a strategic point for resupplying fuel and provisions. It then made its way across the Suez Canal to the port of Gedda in Saudi Arabia. Here on 9 April, the US ship Liberty Passion had already docked. This ship was coming from Livorno, launching a regular monthly service for the transport of weapons from the US base of Camp Darby to the Middle East for the wars in Syria, Iraq and Yemen.

    ROMINA - FRANCEZII SE SCUFUNDÃ de Thierry Meyssan


    Francezii se Scufundä


    Ne aflam în prezenta unei inversiuni istorice în Franta, unde vechiul spectru politic se desface în tãndãri, si unde apare o noua fisurã. Avînd în vedere intensa propaganda mediaticã care a atins tara, francezii nu înteleg referintele esentiale, si se agata de liniile rosii care nu mai exista. Cu toate acestea, faptele sunt clare, si sunt de prevazut anumite evolutii.


     | BEIRUTE (LIBANO)  




    JPEG - 19.8 ko
    Petrecere privatã în La Rotonde:
    Felicitat în calitate de noul presedinte francez, Emmnuel Macron
    primeste personalitati ale Spectacolului, si în special, a lui CAC 40,
    în noaptea primului round al alegerilor.
    Aici poate fi vazut, în conversatie cu un prieten, bancherul Jacques Attali.

    Dupa o campanie electorala foarte agitata, francezii l-au selectionat pe Emmanuel Macron (sprijinit de orasele din centru) si Le Pen, ( sprijinita de zonele suburbane si rurale), pentru cel de-al doi-lea round al alegerii presedintelui.

    Începînd din acest moment, aproape toti candiatii derutati, cu exceptia lui Jean-Luc Mélenchon – si aceasta nu este o întîmplare – au apelat la sprijinul lui Macron, care ar trebui sa fie ales cu usurinta.

    Cele doua mari partide istorice care au guvernat Franta de la începutul celei de-a Cincea Republica, republicanii (ex-gaulistii) si Partidul Socialist (ex-partidarii lui Jaurés), au fost derutati. În timp ce un recent venit ''Înainteaza''! (fapt evidentiat , în special, în occidentul liniei Le Havre-Marseille), si ajunge pe vîrful scenei înfruntînd Frontul National (localizat la estul acestei linii).

    Exista un candidat al fascismului?

    EEUU DESPLIEGA SU COMPLEJO MILITAR "THAAD" EN COREA DEL SUR, ¿QUIÉN ES EL PROVOCADOR? ¡EL PLANETA EN PELIGRO Y NO ES NOTICIA!

    ABOGADOS PROGRESISTAS DE ESPAÑA


    Posted: 25 Apr 2017 11:47 PM PDT
    * China y Rusia se oponen a la instalación del sistema, traerá más inestabilidad en la zona y porque pone en peligro la seguridad de estos dos países. Corea del Sur se convierte en el primer objetivo si Corea del Norte si es atacada.

    ** Ciudadanos surcoreanos hoy han intentado parar el avance del convoy que trasportaba el armamento, que traerá muerte a la península coreana. La anterior presidenta Park fue destituida de la presidencia, y metida a la cárcel por corrupción, pero la verdadera razón es por se oponía a que se instale este escudo antimisil. 



    26/04/2017

    A EEUU poco le importa la población civil surcoreana, solo le importa sus planes expansionaras y de "ganar guerras" que es para lo que ha venido Donald Trump y ha comenzado a trasladar partes de su complejo antimisiles THAAD a su sitio de despliegue en Corea del Sur, causando ira y descontento entre la población local.

    Los enfrentamientos entre los residentes del condado surcoreano de Seongju y la Policía estallaron cuando el convoy de seis camiones que transportaban el radar y otro equipo militar para el sistema de defensa antimisiles estadounidense THAAD entró en el campo de golf donde serán instalados, informa la agencia Yonhap.
      
    Las fuerzas del orden intentaron detener a los manifestantes que se congregaron en la entrada del campo de golf. Asimismo, se movilizó a fuerzas adicionales para controlar a las aproximadamente 8.000 personas congregadas en la zona y para regular el tráfico en las 905 carreteras provinciales que llevan al campo de golf de Seongju.

    Los activistas argumentan que la presencia del THAAD convertiría al lugar en un objetivo principal para Pionyang. Además, los manifestantes agregan que el sistema plantea problemas sanitarios y medioambientales.

    El pasado 17 de abril, Washington y Seúl acordaron definitivamente el despliegue del sistema antimisiles estadounidense THAAD en territorio surcoreano. Los dos países llegaron a un acuerdo sobre el asunto en julio del año pasado.

    Las unidades THAAD constarán de entre 4 y 9 lanzaderas montadas en camiones, cada una con 8 interceptores. La batería supuestamente contará con el poderoso radar AN/TPY-2, capaz de detectar misiles entrantes a grandes distancias.


    REACCION INTERNACIONAL


    China se opone a la instalación del sistema THAAD en Corea del Sur y declaró que no cambiaría su postura respecto a este asunto. "Estamos claramente en contra del despliegue del THAAD en la península", afirmó la semana pasada la Cancillería del gigante asiático. Pekín considera que el despliegue no ayudará a la paz y la estabilidad en la península coreana.


    Por su parte, el canciller ruso Serguéi Lavrov afirmó que el despliegue del sistema de defensa antiaérea en la región es una respuesta inequitativa a las pruebas de Corea del Norte y "representa un peligro para la región".

    Lavrov: Heavy-Handed Stance on N Korea 'Fraught With Catastrophic Consequences

    LIVE
      The aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) transits the Pacific Ocean January 30, 2017

      Lavrov: Heavy-Handed Stance on N Korea 'Fraught With Catastrophic Consequences'

      © REUTERS/ U.S. Navy
      ASIA & PACIFIC
      Get short URL
      1
      29760

      The Russian foreign minister warned against heavy-handed approaches to the North Korea issue.

      MOSCOW (Sputnik) — Military options in resolving the North Korean issue are fraught with disaster in the region, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Wednesday, reiterating Moscow's concerns with the deployment of the US missile system in South Korea.
      "It is obvious that heavy-handed approaches that are beginning to be mentioned publicly are fraught with catastrophic consequences for the Korean Peninsula and the whole of Northeast Asia," Lavrov said.
      Speaking at the VI Moscow Conference on International Security, he expressed concern about the degrading situation in the region with North Korea's continued development of its nuclear missile program.
      Lavrov also voiced Moscow's disapproval "with the disproportionate build-up under the pretext of the North Korean threat of the US and its regional allies' military activity."
      "An extremely destabilizing factor remains the forced deployment of US THAAD systems, a component of the US global missile defense, in the south of the peninsula," the Russian minister said.
      On Sunday, Japan and the United States started naval military exercises in the Pacific Ocean with participation of a US naval group led by the USS Carl Vinson, according to Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force. The group was sent by the United States to the Korean Peninsula amid growing tensions in the region.

      Tuesday, April 25, 2017

      THIERRY MEYSSAN -- The French scuttle their own ship


      The French scuttle their own ship

      We are witnessing an historical reversal in France, where the ancient political spectrum is exploding into pieces as new fractures appear. Because of the intensive storm of media propaganda which has recently almost drowned the nation, the French can now perceive nothing more than the essential markers, and cling to red lines which no longer exist. However, the facts are clear, and certain evolutions are predictable.

       | BEIRUT (LEBANON)  

      JPEG - 19.8 kb
      Private soiree at La Rotonde – congratulated as the new French President, Emmanuel Macron welcomes personalities from the CAC40 and the entertainment world on the evening of the first round of the election. Seen here with his friend, the banker Jacques Attali.
      After a very agitated electoral campaign, the French chose Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen for the second round of the Presidential election.
      Already, almost all the losing candidates, with the exception of Jean-Luc Melenchon – and that’s no accident – have appealed to their followers to support Macron, who should then be easily elected.
      The two major historical parties which have governed France since the beginning of the Fifth Republique - Les Republicains (ex-Gaullists) and the Parti Socialist (ex-Jaurèsians) - have been beaten. A newcomer, En Marche !, has made it to first place on the podium, facing the Front National.

      Is there fascist candidate?

      This is not the first time that this sort of cleavage has occurred in the history of France – on one hand, a partisan of an alliance with what seems for the moment to be the world’s greatest power (the United States), and on the other, a movement seeking national independence – on one hand, the totality of the ruling class, without notable exceptions, and on the other, a party cobbled together of various bits and pieces, composed mostly of proletarians, two thirds of whom come from the right wing and one third from the left.
      Evidently, the next French President will be Mr. Macron – a man from the Banque Rothschild & Cie, now supported by the totality of the business leaders of the CAC40.
      However, whether our prejudices like it or not, the unanimity of the power of money is the fundamental characteristic of fascist parties.
      This unanimity of Grand Capital is always accompanied by a National unity which erases the differences. In order to become equal, we must become identical. This is what President Hollande began with the law « Marriage for all », in 2012-13. Presented as establishing equality between citizens, whatever their sexual orientation, it posited de facto that the needs of couples with children are the same as those of gay couples. And yet there were several other more intelligent solutions. The opposition to this law led to a number of very important demonstrations, but they unfortunately failed to provide any other proposition, and were sometimes mixed with homophobic slogans.
      Identically, the attack against Charlie-Hebdo was celebrated to the chant of « I am Charlie ! », and those citizens who declared that they were « not Charlie » were prosecuted.
      It is a shame that the French people do not react either against the unanimity of Grand Capital, nor against the injunctions to use the same judicial techniques and to favour the same slogans. On the contrary, they insist on considering the current Front National as « fascist », with no other argument than its ancient past.

      Can a fascist candidate be resisted?

      In the majority, the French think that Emmanuel Macron will be a President à la Sarkozy and à la Hollande, men who will pursue their political beliefs. They therefore expect to see their country increasingly decline. They accept this curse, thinking that in this way, they will evacuate the menace of the extreme right.
      Many of them remember that at its creation, the Front National gathered together the losers of the Second World War and the losers of the social politics of the colonisation of Algeria. They focused on the figures of a few men who had collaborated with the Nazi occupier, without seeing that the Front National of today has absolutely nothing in common with those people. They persist in holding Second-Lieutenant Jean-Marie Le Pen (Marine’s father) responsible for the Algerian tragedy, and exonerating from their responsibilities the Socialist leaders of the time, particularly their dreadful Minister of the Interior, François Mitterrand.
      No-one remembers that in 1940, it was a Fascist minister, General Charles De Gaulle, who refused the shameful armistice with Nazi Germany. This man, the official heir apparent of Marechal Philippe Petain (who was his daughter’s godfather), charged into the Resistance alone. Struggling against his education and his prejudices, he slowly gathered around himself, against the wishes of his ex-mentor, French people from all horizons to defend the Republic. He linked up with a left-wing personality, Jean Moulin, who, a few years earlier, had secretly embezzled money from the Minister of the Marine, and trafficked weapons with which to support the Spanish Republicans against the fascists.
      No-one remembers that a colleague of De Gaulle, Robert Schuman, wrote his signature on the armisitice of shame, then, a few years later, founded the European Economic Community (currently the European Union) – a supra-national organisation based on the Nazi model of the « New European Order », against the Soviet Union and today against Russia.

      The Obama-Clinton model

      Emmanuel Macron has recieved the strong support of ex-US President Barack Obama, and has gathered a team for foreign policy composed of the main neo-conservative diplomats. He makes no secret of supporting the external politics of the US Democratic Party.
      Barack Obama, although he presented his foreign policy with a rhetoric which was diametrically opposed to that of his predecessor, the Republican George W. Bush, in practice followed his lead in all points. The two men successively continued the same plan for the destruction of the societies of the Greater Middle East – a plan which has already caused more than 3 million deaths. Emmanuel Macron supports this policy, although we do not yet know whether he intends to justify it by speaking of « democratisation » or « spontaneous revolution ».
      If Hillary Clinton was beaten during the US election, Emmanuel Macron had to be elected in France.
      Nothing proves that Marine Le Pen will be capable of playing the rôle of Charles De Gaulle, but three things are certain :
      - Just as in 1940, the British, choking back their disgust, welcomed De Gaulle to London, today Russia could support Le Pen.
      - Just as in 1939, only a few Communists braved the orders of their party and joined the Resistance, there will only be a few of Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s partisans who will take that step. But as from the Nazi attack on the URSS, it was the whole Communist party who supported De Gaulle and formed the majority of the Resistance. There is no doubt that in the years to come, Mélenchon will fight side by side with Le Pen.
      - Emmanuel Macron will never understand people who resist the domination of their homeland. So he will not understand any better the people of the Greater Middle East who struggle for real independence alonside Hezbollah, the Syrian Arab Republic and the Islamic Republic of Iran.
      Translation
      Pete Kimberley

      assange



      At midday on Friday 5 February, 2016 Julian Assange, John Jones QC, Melinda Taylor, Jennifer Robinson and Baltasar Garzon will be speaking at a press conference at the Frontline Club on the decision made by the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention on the Assange case.

      xmas





      the way we live

      MAN


      THE ENTIRE 14:02' INTERVIEW IS AVAILABLE AT

      RC



      info@exopoliticsportugal.com

      BJ 2 FEV


      http://benjaminfulfordtranslations.blogspot.pt/


      UPDATES ON THURSDAY MORNINGS

      AT 08:00h UTC


      By choosing to educate ourselves and to spread the word, we can and will build a brighter future.

      bj


      Report 26:01:2015

      BRAZILIAN

      CHINESE

      CROATIAN

      CZECK

      ENGLISH

      FRENCH

      GREEK

      GERMAN

      ITALIAN

      JAPANESE

      PORTUGUESE

      SPANISH

      UPDATES ON THURSDAY MORNINGS

      AT 08:00 H GMT


      BENJAMIN FULFORD -- jan 19





      UPDATES ON THURSDAY MORNINGS

      AT 08:00 H GMT

      PressTV News Videos